We’re shaping a more ResponsibleSteel industry.

As global emissions continue to rise, the need to rapidly scale up clean solutions and phase out fossil fuels to align with a 1.5°C pathway has never been greater. For the steel industry, one of the world’s most complex and emissions-intensive sectors, this raises critical questions around how progress should be driven, assessed, and reported transparently.

Real change is reflected not only in boardrooms and corporate strategies, but in the day-to-day operations and decisions at individual production sites. Yet the granular detail that truly reflects the asset-level investments happening at site level is often missing. Without a comprehensive and consistent approach to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions assessment, comparing progress across sites, regions, and production routes becomes nearly impossible. That’s why global standards, and the rigour to apply them consistently, are essential to understanding where the industry stands today and how far it still needs to go.

Principle 10 of ResponsibleSteel’s International Production Standard, which addresses GHG emissions and climate change, is ideally placed to assess the credibility and implementation of a steelmaker’s fossil fuel phase-out strategy. It provides independent, third-party verification of climate performance, demanding a holistic approach to fulfilling climate commitments and effectively bridging the gap between corporate pledges and site-level action.

Certification against ResponsibleSteel’s International Production Standard supports steel procurers and specifiers, financiers, and policymakers among others, by providing verifiable evidence that a steelmaker has, and is effectively implementing, a credible strategy to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050 or earlier.

Integrating renewable energy is increasingly central to the business case for decarbonised steelmaking. This has formed a major part of discussions with ResponsibleSteel stakeholders and was a key theme at ResponsibleSteel’s policy convenings in Delhi and Brussels last year. ResponsibleSteel members are also already beginning to deploy increasing amounts of renewable energy in the production of steel. But to build clean industries of the future, this needs both augmentation and acceleration through both public and private sector initiatives. An example is the work of a member of ResponsibleSteel, We Mean Business Coalition (WMBC), which launched a ‘Fossil to Clean’ campaign, working with companies to phase out fossil fuels by 2040 and to advocate for a well-managed and just transition globally.*

For Certified Steel, ResponsibleSteel applies a fair and consistent approach to calculating GHG emissions, including emissions associated with renewable energy use. Our methodology incorporates specific safeguards for the use of market-based electricity instruments like Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) and Guarantees of Origin (GOs), as well as bio-based fuels, as set out in our  “Fundamentals for GHG Emissions Accounting and Classification”.

As part of our mission - to be a driving force in the socially and environmentally responsible production of near-zero steel -  we have mapped the requirements of the Production Standard against the Fossil to Clean campaign’s focus areas and developed a checklist which can be used as a tool for steelmakers to not only demonstrate alignment with the a ‘Fossil to Clean’ campaign, but also for broader industry stakeholders to recognise and track progress towards a clean industrial transformation.

Decarbonisation and Fossil Fuel Phase-Out Checklist

The checklist is available for download here.

Advancing expectations to demonstrate commitment to climate action

ResponsibleSteel is currently in the process of revising Principle 10’s approach to climate transition plans, under the three guiding principles of ambition, feasibility and simplicity. Based on recent stakeholder consultations, including extensive meetings with a member-based Working Group and independent Technical Advisory Group, Version 3.0 of the Production Standard will likely see a reshaping of the related requirements at corporate (criterion 10.1) and site (criterion 10.5) levels to strengthen credibility.

Credible climate transition plans, as defined by ResponsibleSteel, must include several components to ensure a comprehensive plan, assessment and ongoing management of emissions that balances decarbonisation ambition and investment feasibility, both in the near and long-term. The strategy must be driven by the corporation, cascade down to production sites, and integrate feedback loops to ensure decarbonisation outcomes are realised over time.

The credibility framework for climate transition plans is presented in the following figure:

Beyond the presented credibility framework, the revision of Principle 10 will likely recognise a “step-up” in expectations, including improved clarity in how to demonstrate corporate-level ambition, greater alignment across emissions measurement methodologies, and clearer expectations for material scope 3 emissions inclusion.

ResponsibleSteel holds steelmakers accountable whilst celebrating decarbonisation progress

ResponsibleSteel continues to push the industry towards more ambitious decarbonisation outcomes, not only through the Production Standard’s Core requirements, but also through the Decarbonisation Progress Levels, a market mechanism for the trade of low- and near-zero-emissions steel products.

ResponsibleSteel Certification gives civil society organisations, steel buyers, financial institutions, and policymakers the confidence that a steelmaker has a credible transition plan in place, and that meaningful progress is being made towards its implementation. Now, this checklist provides steelmakers with another practical tool to effectively demonstrate progress on decarbonisation and fossil fuel phase-out.

*WMBC’s ‘Fossil to Clean’ campaign aims to catalyse and guide the shift from fossil fuels to clean solutions, calling on companies to phase out fossil fuel use (especially coal); electrify operations where possible; switch to 100% renewable electricity; eliminate new fossil fuel infrastructure; align climate action with a 1.5°C pathway; and use purchasing power and policy advocacy to accelerate the transition. We Mean Business funded ResponsibleSteel’s policy project in 2025.

In recognition of International Women’s Day, we’re proud to spotlight some of the women who are helping shape a more responsible steel industry through their work at ResponsibleSteel.

Steel has historically lacked diversity, and inclusive perspectives are still underrepresented across the sector. Yet expanding gender diversity is essential—not only for building a stronger and more resilient industry, but for accelerating the transition to a cleaner, more sustainable future.

“For me, the solutions we need to foster a strong, clean steel industry fit for the 21st century lie in foresight, insight, and a strong collaborative ethos. That has been my focus at ResponsibleSteel, and it is a focus shared by dozens of women across the sector, bringing both fresh perspectives and skills. That’s not something you could have said 10 years ago. There is a seismic shift happening in steel, and women should be very proud of the unique roles they are playing to keep the industry focused where it needs to be—on developing sustainably. Let’s keep at it, re‑imagining the industry, connecting ideas and plans, and finding the way forward so that together we ensure we only move ahead.” - Annie Heaton, CEO, ResponsibleSteel

In this video, members of the ResponsibleSteel team share their roles, their journeys into the organisation, and their hopes for the future of responsible steelmaking.

Top image courtesy of ArcelorMittal Brasil.

Today, ResponsibleSteel and the Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance (IRMA) published a landmark report, ‘Driving just transitions in the mining & steel sectors: The role of voluntary sustainability standards’, outlining how voluntary sustainability standards (VSSs) can help deliver fair and inclusive transitions as heavy industries globally move to decarbonise. It is the first report of its kind, jointly authored by VSSs from the mining and steel sectors.

Developed by ResponsibleSteel and IRMA, the report demonstrates how collaboration across the supply chain provides the necessary understanding of the challenges and opportunities faced by both sectors to achieve a truly just transition for mining and steel. ‘Driving just transitions in the mining & steel sectors: The role of voluntary sustainability standards’ introduces nine key principles and five recommendations to help VSSs integrate just transition into their frameworks.

The report also reveals a significant gap—despite commitment at both government and corporate levels to just transition principles, implementation remains slow and inconsistent. With mining responsible for up to 10% of global energy-related emissions and steel also accounting for around 10%, accelerating decarbonisation in these sectors is critical. But without deliberate action, workers and communities most affected by these transitions risk being left behind.

ResponsibleSteel CEO, Annie Heaton, commented, “Decarbonisation is one of the most pressing global issues we face today. But if we ignore its social impacts, we risk serious unintended consequences. With around six million people employed in steel and another 20 million in mining—plus millions more in supply chains and communities that depend on these industries—industry must work together with workers, communities and governments to consider how to plan the transition to benefit people as well as the planet.”

Stakeholders involved in the project—including industry leaders, supply chain actors, academia, governments, trade unions, civil society organisations, local communities, and Indigenous groups—emphasised that these transitions must not only be fast, but fair, putting justice at the heart of industrial change.

IRMA Executive Director Aimee Boulanger observed, "This research shows that for voluntary standards to succeed, they must be structured to improve justice and inclusivity as they decarbonise and protect the environment."

Key findings from the report included:

• Justice at the centre: Stakeholders recognised the urgent need to decarbonise but stressed that justice must guide transition planning.
• Inclusive process: The specific definition of “Just Transition” is highly contested, with varying interpretations. Engaging stakeholders is key to effectively defining the transition scope, identifying social impacts, and shaping mitigation actions.
• Restorative justice challenges: Addressing restorative justice remains complex, requiring deeper collaboration among governments, companies, VSSs, and historically impacted communities.
• Flexibility: Just transitions will differ across contexts and sectors. Principles must remain adaptable to be effective.

Funded by the ISEAL Innovations Fund with support from the Swiss State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (SECO), the report draws on international principles from the International Labour Organisation (ILO) and the UN Working Group on Human Rights, academic justice theory, interviews with 35 stakeholders, and two in-person workshops held in Brussels and Johannesburg.

This work highlights the unique role VSSs can play in providing practical frameworks for implementation, accountability, and verification, setting a clear reference point for steel and mining companies to plan transitions in a way that is equitable and fair. Both ResponsibleSteel and IRMA will continue to engage with stakeholders to discuss the best way to integrate just transition principles into their respective systems.

Read the full report here.

For more information, please contact:

ResponsibleSteel: communications@responsiblesteel.org

Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance (IRMA): info@responsiblemining.net