ArcelorMittal Brazil has achieved ResponsibleSteel Core Site Certification covering six sites: Juiz de Fora, Resende, Barra Mansa, Piracicaba, Sabará, and São Paulo. This achievement follows three previous certifications in 2022 and 2023 for the company's Tubarão, Monlevade, and Vega sites.

ArcelorMittal Brazil is the largest steelmaker in the country, producing long and flat carbon steel products for the automotive, household appliances, packaging, construction, and shipbuilding industries. These six newly certified sites collectively have a production capacity of around 5 million tonnes of steel annually and employ over 5,800 workers and subcontractors.

ArcelorMittal Brazil's President and CEO of ArcelorMittal Long Products and Mining LATAM, Jefferson de Paula stated, “We expect to have 100% of ArcelorMittal’s steel production operations in Brazil certified to site level by next year, meeting the highest standards and sustainability criteria. Thus, we will ensure 40% of sustainable steel production in Brazil.”

ArcelorMittal was the first company in Brazil and the Americas more broadly, to achieve Core Site Certification against the ResponsibleSteel International Production Standard. To achieve Core Site Certification, the sites were evaluated against the Production Standard's 13 environmental, social and governance principles, covering everything from the sites' operating infrastructure and production processes to the way the sites manage their employees and relate with the community.

Annie Heaton, ResponsibleSteel's CEO, commented, “This announcement is significant, given Brazil's strategic position in both steelmaking and iron ore production, and these certifications mean that around a third of the industry's capacity in country is now ResponsibleSteel-certified. As Brazil prepares to host COP30 later this year, it is important to see the steel industry put its sustainability commitments into action, not only to decarbonise but to do so whilst taking responsibility for people and nature. ArcelorMittal Brazil’s ongoing accountability to the world's most rigorous, broad-based sustainability standard demonstrates real leadership in driving the industry's journey to more sustainable practices.”

The certification body in charge of the audits, DNV Brazil, assessed the sites against a range of criteria relating to responsible business conduct, occupational health and safety, stakeholder engagement, control of socio-environmental impacts, water resource management, greenhouse gas emissions, and biodiversity protection, among others. This included reviewing the Biodiversity Master Plan, the Basin Predictability Study, the promotion of projects supported by the ArcelorMittal Foundation, and structural improvements in the common areas of the sites to improve worker safety. The audit process also included visits to each of the sites and interviews with workers and local stakeholders.

Learn more about ResponsibleSteel certification here or view the certificates and public audit summaries for sites currently covered by certification here.

In a year defined by developments that pose serious threats to global stability, both geopolitically and for our climate, many are wondering what we have achieved towards a sustainable future in 2024.

It is tempting to despair as progress on decarbonisation appears stalled, economic conditions render projects less feasible and our political leaders appear distracted. And yet I see many signs that we are building unstoppable momentum towards a transformed industry that can withstand these challenges.

There are change-makers amongst us that are showing resolve, energy and creativity to build the road to a sustainable future. These are the collaborators, the innovators, and the systems thinkers providing the impetus for the long-term transition.

Many, I am proud to say, are members and partners of ResponsibleSteel, who see the powerful potential of our global standards and certification system to help drive us toward a more responsible, fair, and just future. They have sought to work with us, to demonstrate their commitment through certification, and to collaborate to build coherent new systems fit for a better world.

Celebrating certification achievements

‍Let’s start with our members’ certification achievements. Six months after we published our first-ever Progress Report to track the impact our collective endeavour has delivered, we now have:

• Over 160 members headquartered across 36 countries,
• Over 85 sites with Core Site Certification, covering 7% of steel produced annually, both via blast furnaces (42) and electric arc furnaces (17),
• More than 236,000 workers covered by our independent audits that include extensive stakeholder interviews.
• The first site certifications in Vietnam, Canada, Slovenia, Italy, Finland and Sweden as well as new certifications in Germany, France and India.

A significant milestone

‍Most significantly, at Climate Week NYC we announced the world’s first ResponsibleSteel Certified Steel, achieved by U. S. Steel’s Big River Steel site in Arkansas, sending a clear message to the market: progress towards responsible ‘green steel’ is being made, and stakeholders now have a transparent, consistent and credible global system to benchmark it by.

More Certified Steel will follow, and customers that procure it will enjoy a credibility that stands out from the confusing myriad of ‘green steel’ claims. To fortify this, we consulted on our draft Chain of Custody Standard earlier this year that will forge a path to certified physical traceability and allow buyers of Certified Steel to make credible claims for the first time.

Tracking progress towards global climate goals

‍Tracking the progress of the global steel industry in a consistent way is vital, and our report 'Charting progress to 1.5°C through certification' demonstrated the power of the ResponsibleSteel system to benchmark this progress.

Over 25 respected experts agreed to peer review the report, which concluded that by 2030, 15% of the world’s steel needs to demonstrate real decarbonisation progress (achieving ResponsibleSteel Progress Levels 2 or 3) and 8% needs to reach near zero emissions (Progress Level 4).

More than that, every steelmaking site in the world needs to perform better than the current global average emissions intensity. In other words, today’s average steelmaker will become the industry’s worst by 2030 if they don’t start improving their operations.

Regulators, customers and investors have an important role to play here in setting the expectations of the industry and incentivising the transition. We encourage them all to reference our global benchmarks in charting their path to 1.5°C.

And yet the risk is that more frameworks for steel emerge which do not deliver comparable assessments of progress. It’s critical that we work collaboratively to create an international system of standards that are interoperable, ensuring coherence, credibility and positive impact across the board.

Building interoperability

‍I have been delighted this year to develop collaborations with a number of initiatives that seek to reflect ResponsibleSteel’s system of embodied GHG measurement and Decarbonisation Progress Levels within their own frameworks, either through alignment, recognition or conversion.

These are all aspects of the interoperability we need to ensure that global trade in low-emissions steel can flourish. ResponsibleSteel has been a leading voice on how to progress this with the 60+ signatories of the Steel Standards Principles and in conversation with the IEA and the Climate Club. I look forward to sharing more news with you in 2025 on how and where we are putting this into practice.

Alongside this, we are also working at the national level. In the US, ResponsibleSteel’s Progress Level 4 was identified as a benchmark for measuring and defining near-zero steel in the Modern Steel Act. In Germany, we recently welcomed the German Steel Association (WV Stahl) into membership and we continue to build relationships with associations and policymakers in India and China. As regulators at national level develop policy and definitions to incentivise decarbonisation, ResponsibleSteel can support both steelmakers and policymakers to convert their national assessments into a globally coherent and credible system. This year, interoperability became a favourite topic. Next year, we need to turn it into reality.

Looking ahead to 2025 with optimism

‍All this is evidence of the international ecosystem we are building to effectively support the production and trade of low-emission and near-zero steel. That’s why, amidst the growing scepticism and disappointment permeating climate discussions, I have nothing but hope for the year ahead.

I am fuelled by the enthusiasm of our members and stakeholders and their commitment to working across industry, policy, and finance to drive production of and demand for near-zero steel. I want to thank you for your continued thoughtfulness and support.

While 2024 has brought stark reminders of the climate crisis, it has also demonstrated the power of intelligent collaboration. Now is the time to identify common ground and collaborate to turn our commitments and plans into tangible outcomes. Real-world order books, financial arrangements, and large-scale technology implementation. On behalf of the ResponsibleSteel team, I want to wish you and your families much health and happiness, and a peaceful end to the year. We look forward to working with each of you as we take the next steps toward achieving our shared goals in 2025.

Best wishes,

Annie Heaton
CEO, ResponsibleSteel

‍

As we near the end of the year, we are working on a number of key projects for the organisation. Firstly, the consultation on the Production Standard has been extended to December 8th - this extension provides more time for stakeholders to provide valuable feedback.

Secondly, all members will have received the membership survey via email, offering members a fantastic opportunity to help shape the future of ResponsibleSteel. We strongly encourage all members to fill it out - it really does help us to understand what we are doing right, and what can be added or improved.

Finally, we were on the ground at COP29. Read our blog as we analyse the progress made, the challenges that remain, and the critical steps needed as we look ahead to COP30 and beyond.

In this month's newsletter, you will find key updates including:

• Membership survey
• Insights from COP29
• Production Standard consultation
• New audits and certifications
• New 2025 membership fees
• And more...

Click here to view ResponsibleSteel's November 2024 newsletter.

We are delighted to announce that ArcelorMittal's coil coating plant in Contrisson has been awarded ResponsibleSteel Core Site Certification, underscoring the site's holistic commitment to sustainability and the company's continued progress towards certifying all of its European operations.

ResponsibleSteel certification rigorously assesses the responsibility of steel production. Core Site Certification encompasses over 300 stringent requirements, meticulously verified through an international audit process conducted by trained third-party auditors. The certification adopts a holistic approach, covering key areas such as effective management of water and waste, ensuring health and safety at work, and protecting biodiversity.

The certification also requires a commitment to reducing emissions according to a Paris-aligned pathway, which reinforces ArcelorMittal Construction's C5 Green Commitment, a 5-stage plan that sets out the steps the company is taking to implement sustainable practices and be carbon neutral by 2050.

Jana Meisser, Head of ESG at ArcelorMittal Construction commented: “We’re delighted that ArcelorMittal Construction Contrisson plant located in France has achieved site certification against the ResponsibleSteel International Production Standard. This success underlines our continued dedication to show leadership in responsible production techniques and high ethical standards.”

The site was acquired by Arcelor in 2002 but has a history in steel and iron stretching back hundreds of years. Today the site produces around 300,000 tonnes annually, specialising in the manufacture of continuously rolled, galvanized and pre-painted sheets.

The audit demonstrated the positive relationships the site has built with local stakeholders, strong safety and environment management systems, a well-structured roadmap for the reduction of GHG emissions, and plans to improve the water management policy to name a few.

View the certificate and read the public summary here.

It’s no secret that this year’s COP, dubbed ‘the finance COP’, is leaving many walking away disappointed. COP29 has been plagued by accusations around regression on the agreement to phase out fossil fuels and tensions over closing the financial gap needed for developing countries. The final agreement to supply developing countries with “at least $300 billion” a year is a far cry from the $1.3 trillion goal needed.

So what progress has been achieved? And as we look to COP30, what steps need to be taken to accelerate progress?

The finance question at COP now goes far beyond the requirements under the UNFCCC mechanism for Developed Country Parties to provide and mobilise climate finance for developing countries. Private sources of finance may often be leveraged through government commitments. Whether these can compensate for the slow momentum from developed countries remains a source of great anxiety for developing countries.

More than 500 projects aimed at producing near-zero materials and fuels according to Mission Possible Partnership’s Tracker are awaiting deals for finance across both developed and developing countries. 52 of the announced projects are steel, and only 6 of these have reached a final investment decision.

In Baku, whilst progress on committed finance was disappointing, it felt that collaboration among non-state actor initiatives is beginning to drive a focus on the conditions that will make FIDs in near-zero industry projects possible - carbon pricing mechanisms, the creation of markets and trade in lower emissions steel, and alignment across the standards and carbon accounting mechanisms needed to underpin these.

Financing and technical support for developing countries

The need for technical and financial support for developing economies in this regard is clear. This is after all where the lion’s share of materials demand growth is likely to come, and where the infrastructure for the transition may be most lacking. Here, some headway is already being made.

Earlier this year at the Clean Energy Ministerial in Brazil, the Climate Investment Funds launched a call for expressions of interest for its Industry Decarbonisation investment programme which aims to support low-emission pathways in developing countries for industries such as steel, cement, glass, aluminium and textiles. Up to $1 billion in funding is anticipated to support these projects.

At COP29, one of the biggest wins for heavy industry was the launch of the Climate Club’s Global Matchmaking Platform. First announced last year in Dubai, the Platform is designed to support the heavy industry transition toward net zero. By leveraging international cooperation, the platform aims to match industry players in developing and emerging economies with financers, technology and expertise to create tailored decarbonisation solutions.

Creating market mechanisms

To pave the way for such projects to be viable to mainstream finance, sustainable market policies that provide certainty for long-term investments are urgently needed. In Baku, the momentum on this took a step forward with a letter to governments led by the Industrial Transition Accelerator (ITA) calling on them to create demand for lower emissions materials. The letter was co-signed by over 50 companies and coalitions, including ResponsibleSteel, and a network of more than 700 financial institutions. Importantly, it brought together both private and public sector initiatives, including SteelZero, the First Movers Coalition and the Industrial Deep Decarbonisation Initiative (IDDI).  

Some practical tools for policymakers launched in Baku were a welcome addition to the landscape – a Green Demand Policy Playbook from the ITA and with WBCSD, a Green Purchase Toolkit. These provide the start of an innovative school of public policy that is urgently needed to ensure that lower-emissions materials are soon more competitive than their high-emitting relatives.

Driving green public procurement

On the procurement side, pressure is ramping up on governments to make public procurement commitments for lower-emission materials. The IDDI, the First Mover’s Coalition, and the Net Zero Government Initiative all came together to launch a joint statement in Baku calling on governments to increase demand signals through procurement.

The United Nations Industrial Development Organisation (UNIDO) and the IDDI also presented their latest report, "The Scale and Impact of Green Public Procurement of Steel and Cement in Canada, Germany, the UK, and the US." According to the research, implementing policies in line with the IDDI’s Green Public Procurement Pledge Level 3 in these four countries alone could reduce emissions from steel procurement by 81% by 2050. It’s a powerful indication of how governments can leverage their purchasing power to drive industry decarbonisation and help create a market for lower-emission steel.

Underpinning this, IDDI launched its Green Public Procurement Guide series on assessing jurisdictional readiness for procuring low-emission materials, disclosure requirements to support market readiness, and setting commitments, highlighting ResponsibleSteel as a useful framework to meet Pledge Level 3. The Guide offers practical guidance to help governments take actionable steps to incorporate commitments to purchase low-carbon steel and concrete for construction projects into public procurement practices.

Harmonising standards

Finally, as more standards for steel continue to emerge, everyone can agree on the need for harmonisation, or at the very least interoperability, across these different standards to reduce trade friction and facilitate investment. Anything less will only serve as a roadblock to achieving net zero, a sentiment that was frequently shared during discussions in Baku.

The Steel Standards Principles launched in Dubai at COP28 are playing a critical role in driving alignment across definitions for near-zero steel and ensuring interoperability across GHG measurement methodologies. ResponsibleSteel has played an active role over the last 12 months to help establish the foundations for harmonisation and interoperability. Over 60 organisations have now endorsed the Principles and released a statement at COP29 setting the following objectives for 2025:

• Establishing a common boundary for emissions reporting across the steel value chain

• Enhancing data quality and transparency

• Developing common terminology across standards and initiatives

• Increasing stakeholder engagement globally

As part of this work, the World Steel Association has produced a methodology mapping examining similarities and differences in more than 40 criteria across around 80 standards and initiatives, including ResponsibleSteel. This mapping will be a valuable resource for identifying opportunities for harmonisation and improving transparency in the industry, something ResponsibleSteel is committed to doing.

Looking ahead

2025 will mark the 10th Anniversary of the Paris Agreement and COP30 is already shaping up to be the most critical COP since 2015. Accelerating progress on critical issues such as protecting biodiversity and ensuring a just transition will likely have a key role in discussions and there is already pressure on governments to move up their net zero targets.

It’s clear we’re still a long way from where we need to be, within the steel industry and beyond. ResponsibleSteel’s Charting Progress to 1.5°C report concludes that some 8% of the steel industry needs to be produced by near-zero transition projects by 2030 (i.e. reaching our Decarbonisation Progress Level 4). MPP’s Tracker suggests only 6 projects are currently financed. We need to close this gap. We must also avoid relying on these select near-zero projects alone. At least 15% of steel needs to be produced by lower emissions steel plants by 2030 (our Progress Levels 2 and 3) and 100% needs to be where the average of the industry is today (Progress Level 1).

As governments finalise their NDCs for COP30, they need to consider how to send a serious signal to the market that by 2050 only near-zero steel will be acceptable, and devise the mechanisms and the milestones to drive progress towards that goal.

By Savannah Hayes, Communications Manager, ResponsibleSteel

In today’s unpredictable world, one constant remains: the challenge of climate change. And at its centre sits the energy challenge.

We might think of this as the race to convert our power grids to wind and solar, and ensure our future cities, industries and transport rely on clean energy systems. But equally, the foundations of this transformation lie in the very materials these things will be made from: steel, concrete, glass and aluminium. These are the energy-hungry lions – and steel is among the hungriest. It alone makes up 10% of the world’s energy-based greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. If steel were a country, it would be the fourth-largest emitting nation.

Which means steel producers and consumers alike are under pressure to decarbonise, at speed and at scale. The International Energy Agency (IEA) calculates that the industry needs to reduce its emissions by 90% across the board if it’s to stay on track for 1.5 degrees.

ResponsibleSteel CEO Annie Heaton and Climate Group CEO Helen Clarkson write for Reuters on how certification against an international standard is key to driving steel industry progress toward net zero. Read the full op-ed here.

Decarbonisation will radically reshape heavy industries, generating technological, geographical, economic, and social changes. For example, shifting from coal-based processes to green technologies like hydrogen and electrification could have profound financial and logistical implications—increased manufacturing costs, new input materials, stranded assets, production relocation, and more.  

Significantly, decarbonisation could also have adverse social impacts such as causing job loss or displacement and weakening the economic viability of affected communities. ResponsibleSteel and the Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance (IRMA) have launched a joint project to better understand the social impacts of the net-zero transition and how standards can help guide good practice. The project focuses on steel and mining as two examples of hard-to-abate sectors in the metals industry which are deeply connected. This project is possible thanks to a grant from the ISEAL Innovations Fund, which is supported by the Swiss State Secretariat for Economic Affairs SECO.

The project aims to:

1. Identify the role standards can play toward a socially responsible transition.

2. Establish an agreed approach, framework or set of principles to take forward.

The first stage of the project involves in-depth research to answer key questions: What constitutes a just transition? How are the steel and mining sectors already working to ensure a just transition? How are existing standard systems such as ResponsibleSteel working to address issues around a just transition?

The reality of a just transition is complex, taking into consideration different geographies and site levels. This project will harness early examples of successful transitions, looking at where standards have played a valuable role and providing what is likely to be some of the first guidance on tackling this challenge. Given the varying impacts of decarbonisation across regions, IRMA and ResponsibleSteel are uniquely positioned to provide frameworks that apply to these regional contexts.

The project will identify key issues, map how international standards can address them, identify critical gaps, and signpost future work needed to address them. The findings will be tested through engagement with workers, unions, business leaders, and other key stakeholders. Ultimately, the project will identify an agreed approach for the role of standards in advancing a just transition for workers in the steel and mining sectors. The project outcome will be shared with the ISEAL community and broader stakeholders.

If you are interested in participating in the project, please contact our Standards Manager, Haruko Horii.

The steel sector relies heavily on mined and processed minerals as an input to production processes. To help ensure that steel companies can increasingly source minerals from responsible suppliers, ResponsibleSteel recognises input material programmes that are well placed to credibly verify the ESG performance of suppliers.

The Copper Mark is the leading assurance framework for the responsible production of Copper, Molybdenum, Nickel, and Zinc, with the latter three being important contributors to the steel value chain.

The Copper Mark submitted a self-assessment of their Risk Readiness Assessment (RRA 3.0) in December 2023 for recognition against the ResponsibleSteel International Production Standard. Following a public consultation and additional improvements, the Copper Mark is now a recognised programme for Progress Levels 1, 2 and 3 of Principle 3’s responsible sourcing requirements. It is the fourth programme to achieve recognition by ResponsibleSteel.

Annie Heaton, CEO of ResponsibleSteel commented, “A product’s sustainability goes far beyond the boundary of the site where it is produced. It’s imperative not only that steelmakers are operating responsibly but that they are also able to source input materials responsibly. That means seeking credible verification that the metals and ores they are buying come from mines subject to the same principles as they demonstrate with ResponsibleSteel. Recognising the Copper Mark as the fourth input programme under Principle 3 of our Production Standard will go a long way in supporting steelmakers looking to source zinc, molybdenum and nickel from suppliers complying with rigorous ESG standards, and we’re delighted to welcome them into the ResponsibleSteel ecosystem.”

“We welcome this recognition as it will help buyers of zinc, molybdenum and nickel materials on the journey towards Certified Steel. It marks another step in making the standards and assurance landscape collaborative and supporting continuous improvement across the supply chain”, said Michèle Brülhart, Executive Director at the Copper Mark.

Find out more about the Copper Mark here or learn more about ResponsibleSteel’s recognition process here.

It's been another busy month for ResponsibleSteel! The consultation on the Production Standard is still open - and we really encourage anyone who has any feedback on this important document to take part. Our latest opinion piece with Reuters explored the crucial role of credible certification in the steel industry’s journey to responsible net zero. Dr Alli Devlin, our Senior Decarbonisation Advisor, represented us at the ICDA ESG Technical Summit in Brussels, where she shared some valuable insights on decarbonisation.

We are also happy to welcome four new members to ResponsibleSteel representing a diverse set of interests. Looking ahead, we are calling on members to join a working group on our approach to science-based target setting, and will also be working on a membership survey and interviews in the coming weeks.

In this month's newsletter, you will find key updates including:

• Our newest members
• Upcoming trainings
• Opportunities to join the team and get involved in our work
• And more!

Click here to view ResponsibleSteel's October 2024 newsletter.

ResponsibleSteel recently updated our membership fee structure to allow for a fairer reflection of company size and ensure our administrative costs are covered.

These changes were approved by the ResponsibleSteel Board of Directors in September 2024 and will take effect on January 1st, 2025

Key changes to the 2025 membership fees:

1. Revised fees for smaller members: To cover the administrative costs of collecting our membership fees, we have made revisions to the lower tier fees.

2. Introduction of new revenue tier: The lower end of the current fee structure has a steep jump-up in fees. As a result, we will introduce an additional revenue tier (from $1m to $10m).

3. ‘Non-profit’ category changes to ‘Civil Society’: The ‘Non-profit’ classification will be renamed as ‘Civil Society’ to better reflect our membership categories. Civil society membership will continue to be free of charge.

4. Trade Associations: From 2025, trade associations will be charged fees as per other Associate members, regardless of non-profit status, in keeping with other membership associations in our industry.

Members will see these changes reflected in their 2025 membership invoices that will be issued towards the end of the year. We believe these updates will ensure continued inclusivity while maintaining the financial sustainability of our programme.

View a full breakdown of ResponsibleSteel's 2025 membership fees here.

We are pleased to announce that we are conducting a public consultation for the review and revision of the ResponsibleSteel  International Production Standard v2.1. The consultation period is open for 60 days, from 1 October to 8 December 2024.

To ensure that the standard remains effective and relevant to the industry, periodic reviews and revisions are essential. This process is guided by the ResponsibleSteel Standard Development Procedure v3.0 (topic 12.1), which requires a review and revision every 5 years, in alignment with the ISEAL code.

As part of this formal consultation, we engage relevant stakeholders, including ResponsibleSteel Members, approved certification bodies, and ResponsibleSteel certificate holders to assess whether the standard requires revision, and we report the findings to the Board. Additionally, it is mandated that any approved urgent revisions be included in this regular review and revision process.

The standard consists of 13 principles, covering a wide range of sustainability topics, including ESG, GHG, and community-related topics. To guide the review and revision process, we have gathered and reviewed all relevant information and developed a public consultation document proposing the scope of the revisions to the standards.

Please find the public consultation document here.  

The public consultation is open to all stakeholders, and we encourage all relevant stakeholders to participate and provide their valuable input!

Accompanying materials

• Terms of Reference - Review and Revision of the ResponsibleSteel International Production Standard

• Consultation Paper

• Feedback Form

‍

This has been an extraordinary month for ResponsibleSteel. Last week we were proud to announce the achievement of the first Certified Steel by U. S. Steel's Big River Steel at Climate Week NYC. This marks a major milestone for the steel industry. With the first Certified Steel on the market, we are now working with our members and stakeholders to support other steelmaking sites to follow suit and take the next step in certification, while also encouraging steel buyers to promote uptake of Certified Steel.

In this month's newsletter, you will find key updates including:

• The first Certified Steel
• Our newest members
• Upcoming events and trainings
• New opportunities to join the board and team
• And more!

Click here to view ResponsibleSteel's September 2024 newsletter.